Only 14% of young women who enter university chose science-related fields.  This is one of the headline findings of a new report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.  This report examined gender equality in education across 64 countries and jurisdictions. In comparison, 39% of young men who entered university chose to pursue one of those fields of study.
Gender has always been important in education. The report – based on the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests – reveals the extent of the gender gap in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Gender Gap: Let down in science

The university statistics won’t come as a complete surprise to many – though the magnitude of the gender difference is worryingly large. But the school-age data, drawn from 15-year-olds who take the PISA tests every three years, contains an even more alarming message: the UK’s gender gap visible in school results for science subjects is among the largest.

Reports show British 15-year-old girls doing 13% worse than 15-year-old boys. In Finland, girls do 16% better than boys. Of the 64 countries that took the tests, the UK takes 61st place.

Alarming gender gap in school science sets women up to fail
OECD Pisa, CC BY

Many will feel that the findings are hard to believe. They certainly don’t agree with the annual GCSE results in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the equivalent examinations in Scotland. For example, in the 2014 results for the single science GCSE, 56.2% of boys achieved grade C or higher compared to 61.8% of girls.  This is a gender gap of 5.6% in favour of girls.

But if the OECD’s findings are valid, they are deeply disturbing. We know that students who do less well in science at school are less likely to continue with it.  We  also know that students who take STEM degrees end up glad that they did and get well-paid jobs.

Hearing the wrong messages

This has nothing to do with biological difference between the sexes. Across the 67 countries that took the tests, the average gender difference in science was only 1%,.  So the explanation must be a cultural one.  The OECD report has a mass of statistics about gender differences in such things as attitudes, self-regulation, and girls’ lack of self-confidence in their science and mathematics abilities. What it comes down to is the messages that girls hear from others, and then internalise.

Despite television presenters like Alice Roberts and the growing prevalence of senior female scientists in the UK (Dames Athene Donald, Julia Goodfellow, Julia Higgins, Julia King, to mention just four) too often it seems that girls hear that science is not for them. Or, subjects such as human health are OK for them to pursue but not “hard” sciences like physics and chemistry

Campaigns like Let Toys Be Toys are doing their bit to tackle gender stereotyping at an early age.  However,  schools should be doing more to protect both girls and boys from society’s gender stereotyping.

Time pressures

When I trained to be a school teacher back in the 1980s, sociologists and other experts gave many sessions about the importance of gender, social class and ethnicity and the assumptions that society – and we as teachers if we weren’t careful – all too often made about pupils. Today, time pressures and changes to how teachers are trained mean that it is less likely that new teachers will receive the depth of training on this topix.  The preoccupation with students’ examination results means that schools now have less time and determination to produce self-confident, rounded citizens. We need to get back to realising that how school students see themselves and their subjects is important. If we don’t, too many young people, especially girls, will continue to believe that science is not for them. By thinking that way, they won’t be.


We published this article with the IOE London blog.

The Conversation

Michael Reiss, Professor of Science Education, UCL

Read the original article on The Conversation.

Leave a comment